Is laparoscopic ventral rectopexy a good treatment option for rectal prolapse?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Aim: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is one of the most commonly performed procedures in treatment rectal prolapse (RP). This study aimed to evaluate postoperative changes incontinence status and short-term functional outcomes patients with RP who underwent LVR.
 Material Method: included 15 LRV diagnosis between January 2017 June 2021 at Health Sciences University Ankara Numune Training Research Hospital City Hospital. Data were obtained by retrospectively examining electronic records patients. The Wexner score (WIS) was calculated preoperatively postoperatively contacting phone six months after operation. In addition, constipation whether they had recurrence questioned.
 Results: mean age 55 (range, 30-81) years. Twelve (80%) female three (20%) male. When preoperative WISs compared, latter statistically significantly lower than former (p=0.002). Among 10 (66.7%) period, this complaint resolved four (40%), but new-onset detected two (40%) five (33.3%) without constipation. observed only (6.7%) patient follow-up.
 Conclusion: Considering for RP, it can be concluded that LVR a good option group, low rate satisfactory improvement incontinence.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Short term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse

OBJECTIVE To find out the short term outcomes of effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse. METHODS It was a descriptive case series study of 31 consecutive patients of rectal prolapse in Colorectal division of Ward 2, Department of General surgery, Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Center, Karachi, from November 2009 to November 2015. These patients were admit...

متن کامل

Response to laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception using a biological mesh.

We read with interest the article by Albayati et al published recently.1 There is a sparsity of long term data in use of biological mesh in laparoscopy rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. We appreciate the efforts made by Albayati et al in this study and note the homogeneous population in terms of gender, age and BMI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

متن کامل

Robot-assisted rectopexy is a safe and feasible option for treatment of rectal prolapse.

INTRODUCTION Rectal prolapse is seen in up to one in 100 elderly women and results in symptoms such as incontinence, mucus secretion and constipation. The aim of this study was to present short- and longterm outcomes after robot-assisted rectopexy in patients with rectal prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients diagnosed with rectal prolapse at our institution underwent robot-assisted rect...

متن کامل

Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse

INTRODUCTION Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a recognized treatment for posterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The aim of this review is to provide a synopsis of the evidence for biological mesh use in VMR, the most widely recognized surgical technique for posterior compartment POP. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed was conducted using the search terms "VMR," "ventral mesh rec...

متن کامل

Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception.

OBJECTIVE This systematic review assesses the effectiveness of ventral rectopexy (VR) surgery for treatment of rectal prolapse (RP) and rectal intussusception (RI) in adults. Method MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and other relevant databases were searched to identify studies. Randomized controlled trials or nonrandomized studies with more than 10 patients receiving ventral mesh rectopexy surgery were ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Anatolian Current Medical Journal

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2718-0115']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1034966